Nokia is striving
for legitimacy by:
· Being aware of the risk prevention of every activity at every department (for example hearing protection in the copper wire braiding department); having fire extinguishers.
· Establishing a welfare committee for the workers
· At least on the paper, determining legal working times of 8 hours
· Having a good record keeping system
· The acceptance of the external audit and the openness to audits´ questions and suggestions
· The willingness to have a contract for every employer in the future
Nokia´s approach to diffusing sustainability is
effective because
• As she speaks with the top manager, she explains how Nokia is creating a system for being sustainable, therefore indirectly teaching them how to do it themselves. For example determining the ethical requirements expected from suppliers, the communication and monitoring of these.
• She explains the economic advantages of such audits to Nokia, like incrasing product price and also protecting themselves from any disadvantageous news; in general terms reducing the the risks to damage the company´s good will.
• The general feedback from the audit starts with a very possitive output, the indication of the aspects to be improved is clear and consistent.
• They communicate with managers of different levels, allowing them to individually think on what is wrong and how it could be improved. This is a simple way to multiply the message.
How could another
coordination mechanism improve on this?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Diana Carolina,
ReplyDelete- I think what you have written now serves as a good outline for a final product. This is because I think you did the argumentation very well, it just needs a little more elaboration.
- I agree with what you wrote, but maybe a hint: Look at Powell and DiMaggio (1983) for some mechanisms, I think this could be a valuable addition to your writings.
Kind regards,
Hans Peter
You made a nice outline of all the things that need to be included in the post. However, I have the feeling this is more a draft than a final version. As you merely made bullet point, without much explanation or interpretation. Therefore, I would advice to revise this posts into a final version. Furthermore, your post could be improved by including more of the theory of DiMaggio and Powell. By this I mean, explaining the theory and applying it to the case of Nokia.
ReplyDelete